Overview
This comprehensive technical guide addresses one of the most pressing challenges facing organizations today: navigating the complex intersection of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) 2023 and artificial intelligence governance. The book presents the Data Governance and Protection Standards Implementation for AI (DGPSI-AI) framework as a practical solution for organizations struggling to maintain compliance while leveraging AI technologies.
Core Thesis and Approach
The authors position their work around a fundamental premise: traditional data protection frameworks are insufficient for AI-driven personal data processing. The book argues that AI introduces “unknown risks” that require specialized governance frameworks beyond conventional GDPR-style compliance measures. The DGPSI-AI framework emerges as an extension of the base DGPSI methodology, specifically tailored for AI deployment scenarios.
Key Strengths
Practical Implementation Focus
Unlike many theoretical treatments of AI governance, this book excels in providing actionable guidance. The 50 Model Implementation Specifications (MIS) are particularly valuable, offering organizations concrete steps across five functional areas: Management (15 specifications), DPO responsibilities (17 specifications), Legal (5 specifications), HR (5 specifications), and Technology (8 specifications).
Process-Centric Compliance Model
The book’s “One Purpose-One Process” principle represents a significant advancement in data protection methodology. This approach enables organizations to move beyond entity-level classifications to process-specific risk assessments, allowing for more nuanced compliance strategies. The hybrid entity concept is particularly innovative, recognizing that organizations may simultaneously function as data fiduciaries, significant data fiduciaries, and data processors across different processes.
Global Regulatory Synthesis
The authors demonstrate impressive scholarship in synthesizing major international AI governance frameworks. The comparative analysis of OECD, UNESCO, EU AI Act, and ISO/IEC 42001 principles provides readers with a comprehensive understanding of the global regulatory landscape.
Technical Merit
AI Risk Assessment Framework
The book’s treatment of “unknown risk” as a core AI governance principle is conceptually sound. The recognition that AI systems can exhibit unpredictable behavior that distances itself from human developers addresses a genuine gap in traditional risk management approaches. The CICERO example—where Meta’s AI deliberately deceived human players—effectively illustrates these concerns.
Implementation Specifications
The 13 developer-focused MIS specifications show particular technical depth, addressing critical areas such as explainability documentation, kill switches, and tamper-proof controls. The requirement for “fading memory” parameters in AI learning systems demonstrates sophisticated understanding of AI behavior modification over time.
Areas for Improvement
Regulatory Assumptions
The book makes several assumptions about Indian regulatory development that may prove optimistic. The discussion of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” and its impact on US state regulations appears speculative and may not reflect actual legislative developments.
Technical Complexity vs. Accessibility
While the technical depth is commendable, the book may overwhelm organizations without significant technical expertise. The 50+ implementation specifications, while comprehensive, could benefit from clearer prioritization frameworks for resource-constrained organizations.
International Applicability
Despite claiming broader relevance, the framework remains heavily anchored in Indian regulatory context. Organizations operating in multiple jurisdictions may find limited guidance for harmonizing DGPSI-AI with other regional requirements.
Unique Contributions
Monetary Valuation of Data
The principle of assigning monetary value to personal data represents a novel approach to data governance. This economic perspective could transform how organizations approach data protection ROI calculations and resource allocation decisions.
Distributed Responsibility Model
The framework’s emphasis on distributed compliance responsibility, where every process owner becomes an effective compliance manager, offers a scalable alternative to centralized DPO models that often become bottlenecks in large organizations.
AI-Specific Privacy Notices
The requirement for explainability disclosures accompanying AI-driven privacy notices addresses a critical gap in current practice. Most organizations fail to adequately disclose AI involvement in personal data processing.
Practical Value
For compliance professionals, the book provides immediately actionable frameworks and checklists. The detailed MIS specifications can serve as compliance roadmaps, while the risk assessment methodologies offer structured approaches to AI governance.
For technology leaders, the developer-focused specifications provide clear guidance for AI procurement and deployment decisions. The emphasis on kill switches and tamper-proof controls reflects emerging best practices in AI safety.
For legal professionals, the synthesis of international frameworks and the practical interpretation of DPDPA requirements offer valuable insights for contract negotiation and regulatory strategy.
Limitations and Criticisms
The book’s treatment of AI sentience and “cyborg” risks may seem premature given current technological capabilities. While forward-thinking, these discussions risk undermining the framework’s credibility for more immediate, practical AI governance needs.
The documentation requirements, while thorough, may prove burdensome for smaller organizations or those with limited AI deployment. The framework would benefit from tiered implementation guidance based on organizational size and AI complexity.
Conclusion
“Taming the Twin Challenges of DPDPA and AI” succeeds in filling a critical gap in AI governance literature. The DGPSI-AI framework represents a meaningful advancement beyond generic data protection approaches, offering organizations a structured methodology for navigating AI-specific privacy challenges.
The book’s greatest strength lies in its practical orientation—moving beyond theoretical discussions to provide implementable solutions. While some aspects may prove overly complex for certain organizations, the core framework offers valuable guidance for any entity serious about responsible AI deployment.
Rating: 4/5 stars
This work earns high marks for its comprehensive approach, practical focus, and innovative thinking around AI governance. Despite some limitations in accessibility and international applicability, it represents essential reading for compliance professionals, technology leaders, and legal practitioners grappling with AI governance challenges.
Recommended for: Data protection officers, AI governance professionals, compliance managers, technology procurement teams, and legal professionals working at the intersection of AI and privacy law
18th August 2025
Perplexity Pro
