US Shutdown

The forced shutdown of US Government has now entered the second day and is threatening to affect other economies. For general information we may state that US Shut down has arisen because the House of Representatives dominated by the Republican party has refused to pass the Government budget before the expiry of the earlier budgetary sanction (September 30). The reason is that Republic party does not approve the so called “Obama Care” bill officially known as the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (ACA) and expenses associated with it which are part of the budget. The shut down has affected 800,000 federal workers  and is expected to cost the economy about $1 billion a week. This is the first such event since 17 years and is likely to leave an indelible mark on the Obama administration.

The Affordable Care Act envisages mandatory health insurance for all Americans to commence from January 1, 2014. The Act has already come into effect with the  enrollments under the Health Insurance Exchange  commencing from 1st October 2013.

For Details visit here. 

More information here 

Obama care Facts

The Act itself is a revolutionary legislation which aims at providing health care security to every American. It envisages that obtaining health insurance coverage is mandatory and for those who cannot afford, there would be a certain subsidization.

“The law is expected to eliminate pre-existing conditions, stop insurance companies from dropping cover when a person is sick, protect against gender discrimination, expand free preventative services and health benefits, expand Medicaid and CHIP, improve Medicare, mandate larger employers insure employees, create a marketplace for subsidized insurance providing tens of millions individuals, families and small businesses with free or low-cost health insurance, and decrease healthcare spending and the deficit.”

The Republican party is opposed to the law since it is felt that the Democrats steam rolled its passage ignoring the opposition when it was passed in 2010. The economic feasibility of the proposal is also under debate. (Similar to the Food Security Bill controversy in India).

A legal challenge led by the law’s Republican opponents ended in June 2012 when the Supreme Court validated the law’s keystone provision – a requirement that Americans not receiving health coverage from their employers or the government purchase individual plans or pay a fine.

Now the Republic party which has a majority in the House of Representatives has put its foot down on the passage of the budget and the result is the shut down of all non essential Government activity. Employees of non essential Government services are now on  “Leave without Pay” disrupting the economic activities of different kinds. It is also feared that by October 17, there will be a need for another endorsement from the House of Representatives on raising the Government borrowing limits and if it does not occur there could be defaults on US treasury bonds and a global repercussion in terms of increased interest rates etc. If the crisis is not defused by then, the consequences could be disastrous even for Stock markets in India.

Since many of the provisions of the Act have already commenced from October 1, 2013, Obama and the Republicans have reached a stage where neither can retract without losing face. It is a serious political crisis which is likely to determine the results of the next Presidential elections and hence neither party is willing to give in.

In India we have faced many similar challenges in the Parliament where the finance bill has been under the mercy of the opposition parties. However, opposition parties have always avoided the crisis by letting the finance bill pass even though they are opposed to the Government policies in general which indirectly increase Government spending in the budget. Whether it is the Food Security Bill or the Corruption, the ultimate burden is on the people with increased tax burdens but the opposition has never expressed the resolve to shoot down a Finance bill which can force the Government to resign. But in US it appears that neither the President is weak to retract nor the opposition meek to let things pass.

The outcome of the crisis is uncertain. Optimists hope that the crisis would be resolved within a short time of a day or two in which case the crisis may pass off. If it persists beyond October 17, we may be in for a major economic crisis that may hit even India.

The silver line for India is that once the Obama Care provisions get implemented, there would be a huge business potential for Indian IT Companies and BPOs and the prospects of the IT industry will get a boost just like the Y2k issue.

P.S: It was interesting to observe the reactions of the American people on the street when they were asked by CNN if they liked Obama Care or Affordable Care Act. Almost all said that they supported Affordable Care Act and opposed Obama Care without realizing that both were the same. This shows not only how much the average American is ignorant as much as the effect of naming  social welfare activitities in the name of political leaders. We in India are used to many many Rajiv Gandhi schemes and such schemes will be opposed by people just for the reason of the name. There is a lesson for politicians in India in this.

Naavi

Posted in HIPAA | Leave a comment

RBI mandates Bank liability for POS frauds

RBI had announced certain risk mitigation measures for Card Present transactions vide 22nd Sept 2011. Under this circular, it had been mandated that Banks should implement commercial readiness of acquiring infrastructure to support PIN based POS systems before June 30, 2013.  (Ref circular of 22nd sept 2011).

RBI again reiterated vide its circular of February 28, 2013 (Refer circular of 28th Feb 2013) along with detailed guidelines for securing card payment transactions.

Unfortunately, Banks were not ready to implement the security measures in time and hence on June 24, 2013, RBI was forced to extend the deadline for implementation from June 30, 2013 to September 30, 2013.

However, RBI has today vide its circular (Refer circular dated 27th September 2013) indicated that   It has been decided not to grant any further extention of time for implementation of technology requirements as indicated in its circulars of Sept 2011 and 28th February 2013.

More importantly, RBI has also indicated that Banks not complying with the requirements shall compensate loss, if any,incurred by the card holder using card at POS terminals not adhereing to the mandatory standards. The responsibility would be that of the acquiring Bank but the card issuing Bank should make the payment to the customer when a fraud is notified and then recover the money from the acquiring Bank.

Procedure for settlement of the claim shall be as under.

(a) The issuing bank would ascertain, within 3 working days from the date of cardholder approaching the bank, whether the respective POS terminal/s where the said transaction/s occurred is/are compliant with TLE and UKPT/DUKPT as mandated.

(b) In the event it is found that the POS terminals are non-compliant as mandated, the issuing bank shall pay the disputed amount to the customer within 7 working days, failing which a compensation of Rs.100 per day will be payable to the customer from the 8th working day.

(c) The issuing bank shall claim the amount paid by it to the customer from the respective bank/s which have acquired the POS transaction/s in question.

(d) The acquiring banks have to pay the amount paid by the issuing bank without demur within 3 working days of the issuing bank raising the claim, failing which the Reserve Bank of India would be constrained to compensate the issuing bank by debiting the account of the acquiring bank maintained with the Bank.

Naavi.org appreciates the spirit behind the circular which for the first time has demonstrated that RBI is willing to impose its authority on the Banks who are refusing to implement security measures as recommended by the regulator and the law.

We hope that RBI will continue to adopt a similar stringent practice for imposing KYC, GGWG recommendations and security of mobile Banking etc.

It may be mentioned here that Naavi has raised the issue of “Face Book Banking App” which ICICI Bank has launched and asked RBI to clarify if this method of Banking is approved and whether the security audits have been undertaken before the app was launched etc.

Hope RBI will respond to this query and exhibit the same tenacious approach that it has now displayed for securing the Card Not Present transactions even in respect of Internet and Face Book Banking.

It has been the continuing demand of Naavi that RBI should mandate Cyber Crime insurance for all internet and mobile banking transactions and it is reiterated in the current context.

Naavi

Posted in Bank, RBI | Leave a comment

Facebook Banking application from ICICI Bank

The ICICI Bank application on Face Book that facilitates money transfers to “Friends” is reported to have the following functionality. The application is called “Pockets”

-Split & Share that allows customers to split and track expenses and share them with friends on Facebook. It also allows one to send reminder on pending payments. This is a very interesting feature as it’s usually cumbersome to keep a track of expenses when you’re out with friends.

– The app also allows one to make a payment to friend, recharge prepaid mobile, book movie tickets. Another interesting feature is one does not need to know bank account details of their friends to make a transfer, users can create a coupon which can be redeemed by their friends.

– One can also carry out non-financial transactions such as accessing a mini statement of savings bank account, getting demat holding statements, open fixed or recurring deposit, order a cheque book, stop a cheque payment, upgrade debit card, among others.

Details available at: Medianama : ICICI Bank : ICICI Bank2

A security review of the product is due.

Naavi

Posted in Bank | Leave a comment

Discussion Paper on Future Banking Structure in India

RBI had released a discussion paper on the Indian Banking Structure-Future Way Ahead. Comments can be sent upto October 31 2013.

Copy of the discussion paper is available here

The discussion paper has many points of debate such as Small Banks Vs Big Banks, Universal Banks, Licenses on tap etc. However the emphasis on “Safe Banking” appears to be inadequate.

Naavi

Posted in Cyber Law | Leave a comment

RBI may very well disclose its favourite Bank Licensee

In a series of changes announced by RBI on the criteria for selecting Bank licensees, one more statement has come out today stating that “RBI may dilute the initial Capital Requirement to accommodate more licenses”.

Report

Coming after addition of a late applicant and pre-poning the license issue date to meet the deadline of declaration of the Loksabha elections and expansion of the original RBI policy to restrict the number of licenses, it is clear that RBI is trying to accommodate political vested interests in the issue of new licenses.

It is unfortunate that the term of a professional RBI Governor with US citizenship is starting under such strange circumstances.

Instead of this round about way of showing preferences of various kind to the new licensees, RBI may very well admit that it has some favourite applicant  and to accommodate him, it does not mind granting licenses to all the 27 applicants. Some of these will make money on the stock market now before dropping out of the responsibilities. 

God save the Indian Bank customers!

Naavi

Posted in RBI | Leave a comment

Khayaal aapka..loss bhi aapka..laabh to hamara

In an interesting technology innovation, ICICI Bank has announced introduction of a “Face Book” application which can enable you transfer funds from your account to your face book friends.

According to information available, in order to  make a payment to any friend on Facebook using the Pockets app customers fill in a short form, choosing which account to send the money from, the recipient’s name and the amount to be transferred. Once the transaction is confirmed, both the sender and the recipient receive a ‘coupon ID’ and a passcode. Then  the recipient has to click a link in an e-mail, which takes them to a page where they have to enter the coupon number, their name and bank account details and, finally, the passcode, to accept the payment.

According to the CEO of ICICI Bank, Mrs Chanda Kochchar,  “This innovation is in line with our philosophy of Khayaal Aapka wherein we offer products and services which make banking easier and more convenient for our customers. ‘Pockets by ICICI Bank’ will enable the young consumers, who spend a lot of time on Facebook, to carry out a wide set of transactions without having to leave the social media site.”

Refer report

This is fine. But what ICICI Bank needs to disclose is the “Risk” that this new application will pose to the users and who is responsible for the loss if any which may arise due to either phishing or a trojan on the mobile.

I also urge RBI to clarify if this form of banking is approved from their end taking into account any risk assessment that has been made. I would like some body in Mumbai to apply for an RTI with RBI to find out if a risk assessment has been done by RBI before permitting this  Facebook app and if not whether the system of Internet Banking as approved by RBI can be extended to such methods. If the risk in such applications is higher than the current Internet Banking or Mobile Banking methods, will RBI clarify what steps it has taken to ensure safety of Bank Customers.

We would like to draw the attention of the new Governor Mr Raghuram Rajan that while he is correct in identifying the inflaiton control as a priority, he should also bestow attention on preserving the integrity of the Indian Banking system.

Naavi

Posted in ITA 2008, RBI | 1 Comment