Author Archives: Vijayashankar Na

(This is in further continuation of the previous article on definitions in the SC draft regulations) The draft Supreme Court Regulations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026  (SCAIF) appears to treat “Sensitive Judicial Data” as a proxy … Continue reading →

FDPPI’s AI Chair would like to draw attention of readers to to https://reglegbrief.com/ a website which provides many useful information to AI auditors. RegLegBrief is the public research output of Verdus Technologies Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-incorporated regulatory technology firm. The … Continue reading →

I came across an interesting Linked in post today. I could have just given a link to the post and moved on. But I felt that it is better to reproduce the entire post just to ensure that readers donot … Continue reading →

Following the comparison of AI definition in the Supreme Court AI framework and the DGPSI definition a need for refinement of the AI definition for DGPSI auditors has arisen. At present, the DGPSI definition of AI followed the description provided … Continue reading →

This is in further continuation of the discussion on the Supreme Court AI regulations (Draft) In the Supreme Court draft regulations on AI usage, AI has been defined as “a machine-based system that infers, learns, and generates decisions, predictions, and … Continue reading →