DPDPA is Here
Countdown to 13th May 2027
Google_site_search
-
Ask Vishy, the personal AI-assistant of Naavi for all your information on Naavi.org
Naavi

IICA Qualified Independent Director

-

-
DGPIN: 4PJ-7T8-FK8P: 12.94018310,77.55421020
-
Plus Code : WHR3+3P
Bing_site_search
-
Recent Posts
- This Day 12 Years Back: From Simple Phishing Emails to the Looming Shadows of Synthetically Generated Fraud
- DGPSI-Hospital open for Public Comments
- Exploring the Concept of Intermediary and Intermediary Regulation in India-2026-2
- Exploring the Concept of Intermediary and Intermediary Regulation in India-2026-1
- Aggregated Data Fiduciaries: A New Governance Model for DPDPA Compliance in the Banking Sector
Archives
Archives by Date
-
-
Tag Archives: section 65B
Role of Potential Digital Evidence in criminal investigations
During the last week, Bengaluru witnessed a disturbing display of lawlessness by a group led by a son of a Congress MLA. The case involved a brawl in a Pub called “Farzi Cafe” in UB City in which another person … Continue reading
Posted in Cyber Law
Tagged CCTV, digital evidence, Farzi cafe, mallya hospital, mohammad nalpad, narayanaswamy, privacy, section 65B, Shafhi Mohammad
Leave a comment
Section 65B clarified… e-book
Naavi has published a few e-books as detailed here Additionally, e-book exclusively on Section 65B titled “Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act clarified” has been published. This book is available at Rs 150/- as an E Book. ThisĀ … Continue reading
New Year Resolutions
As the new year 2018 dawns on us and we complete the sending of greetings to all our friends, it is time to start thinking how this year will be different from our previous years and how we make it … Continue reading
Posted in Cyber Law
Tagged bitcoin, CEAC, cyber appellate tribunal, naavi, New Year, section 65B
Leave a comment
Certifier under Section 65B need not mandatorily be a witness also
Recently, I was posed a question as follows: Quote: Mr A who produced the CDR from SERVER with Sec. 65B certificate which was filed in the court by IO. However, since Mr. A was not produced as witness, both the … Continue reading




