Indian Regulators worried about Money laundering use of Bitcoin

The Indian regulator appear to be concerned with the growing attention of Bitcoin. The increase in the exchange value of the currency to around US$ 1200 appear to be creating panic amongst the regulators without considering the real impact on the economy.

It is stated that the total Indian currency in circulation is around 9.7 lakh crores worth. The global Bitcoin population is now estimated to be around 10% of this. Of this, Indian holding is negligible. Even after the hypeabout Bitcoin surfaced, during the last week of November the total downloads of Bitcoin mining software in India was about 0.8 % of the global downloads and about 2.5% of of the downloads from China. The fake currency in India itself is estiamted to be around Rs 6000 crores, several times higher than the possible Bitcoin holding. Hence the real impact is not worth fearing at this point of time.

RBI is looking at the possibility of Bitcoin being used by criminals. This is a possibility as much as the use of fake currency and the black money hoarding in Swiss Banks.

SEBI is also reported to be looking at the Business Objectives in the memorandum of association filed by companies working in this domain as perhaps exchange houses.

It would be interesting to observe how the regulators are likely to respond. Before the proposed global conference we may see a media frenzy which may further muddy the waters.

This Business Standard Article is perhaps the beginning of the media onslaught.

Naavi

Posted in bitcoin, Cyber Law | Leave a comment

Bitcoin represents the third war between the digital society and the physical society

In order to increase the acceptability of Bitcoin for ecommerce purchases everywhere, a service has emerged where by an intermediary takes the responsibility of converting the buyer’s bitcoin payments to the legacy currency of the ecommerce site. Bitsumo  a company in Bolivia has offered to assist bitcoin users to shop in all e commerce sites with bitcoins at a price of around $3 per transaction.

Bitsumo type of  of conversion services will become more common in days to come and certainly helps in making bitcoins more acceptable. However before rushing to use such services it is essential to establish the reliability of the intermediary.

As the popularity of Bitcoins seem to grow unabated, the voice of pessimists are also growing shriller. There are many who claim that Bitcoin is doomed to fail and Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme.

While discussions on Bitcoins have been occupying the Indian minds as a prelude to the first global Bitcoin conference coming up in Bangalore in the second week of December, it is time to spare a thought on how to help public not losing money in pursuance of what may turn out to be a mirage.

In the opinion of Naavi.org, Bitcoin system or the crypto currency concept in general is an innovative concept which is inherently capable of providing a digital form of currency which can be functionally more efficient than the traditional fiat currencies which are more prone to inflationary pressures. However the balance of legal enforcement power is today with the physical world and if the masters of the physical world so decide, they have the ability to kill the concepts like Bitcoin by force. Will they do it? is the question and not whether they can do it.

Naavi.org had been arguing for a long time for Cyber Laws by the Netizens and for the Netizens. However what finally got adopted and thrived is “Cyber Laws for the Netizens by Non Netizens”. The laws therefore were meant more for protection of the non netizens rather than the netizens. The regulators considered the cyber space as a continuum of the physical space and created laws accordingly rather than letting both societies grow on their own and manage only the bridge between the two societies.

Bitcoins now has posed a fresh challenge to the world to resolve the conflicts between the two societies.

The first war between the digital society and the physical society was fought on copyrights. This was decisively won by the physical society with the closure of Napster.

Presently the second major inter society war is happening on the Social media in the form of “Privacy Protection” Vs “Security Requirements”. the trend is again indicating a victory for the Security Needs.

Now the war about whether Crypto currencies should survive or not appear to be the emerging as the third war between the Cyber and Meta societies.

Will it be third time lucky for the cyber society? or

Will we finally learn to live together and find a way for the two societies to strike a treaty where the crypto currencies may be allowed to survive and also benefit the meta society?

…is the problem on hand. Perhaps this is more difficult than the crypto problems which the bit coin miners have been trying to solve day in and day out.

Striking a treaty between the two societies also implies that representatives of both societies try to handle the issue diplomatically and with a spirit of give and take. While the Regulators in the Meta society has  people who have such diplomatic skills, it is not clear if the Bitcoin community dominated by young technical minds and speculative traders have the necessary maturity for a diplomatic bargain.

The attempt towards finding a mutually acceptable solution to let Bitcoin survive can start with India if RBI the regulator has an open mind and starts a dialogue with the Bitcoin community without looking at Crypto currencies as an attempt to challenge regulation and therefore intrinsically inimical to the society. The opportunity is here with the global conference in Bangalore.

It is stated that RBI is “Watching” the Bitcoin situation and it is rumoured that RBI and SBI representatives are likely to participate in the conference. At least the Indian stakeholders of the Bitcoin community would be well represented in the conference. There is therefore no better opportunity than to start a dialogue right here and now on how to make the Bitcoin system acceptable to the regulators and how to prevent the regulators from taking such restrictive actions that may make the doomsday predictions come true.

I urge the conference organizers to form a “Crypto Currency Association of India” as a legal entity in the physical world with a responsibility to negotiate with the RBI to find an amicable solution to the perceived conflict between the digital society and the physical society as a result of the emergence of Bitcoin.

Naavi

Posted in bitcoin, Cyber Law | Leave a comment

Physical Version of Bitcoin with Gold Backing?

It is reported that an island called Alderney in the northern part of Channel Islands located between Northern France and UK will be minting Bitcoins in physical form. The island has a population of 1903 persons . It is likely that the coin will have a gold content of US Pounds 500/- to provide a value backing in terms of Gold. The value of this Bitcoin in terms of US $ would be around $818 as against the current value of Virtual Bitcoin around $1200.

Refer Article: 

It is an interesting development for economists to think of the consequences.

Naavi

Posted in bitcoin, Cyber Law | Leave a comment

Tata Sons withdraws Application for Banking license

In a decision that looks surprising to many, Tatasons has withdrawn its application for Banking license.

Refer story

This is the second group after Videocon to have withdrawn its application.

It would be interesting to observe the impact of the decision of Tatasons on other applicants.

Naavi

Posted in Bank, Cyber Law | Leave a comment

Is virtual currency popularity built on Banking inefficiency?

The exploding popularity of Bitcoins and other crypto currency is a matter of concern and intrigue for all economists.

One of the USPs of the Bitcoins for example is the ability to move it from one holder to another holder in about 10 to 15 minutes while international Bank transfers may take longer time.

Also Bank transfers are often revoked several days after the recipient is notified of the receipt while Bitcoin transfer is irrevocable. There have been many frauds committed only on account of “Chargebacks” and revocation of payment orders.

The other advantage of the use of Bitcoins for payments is the absence of transfer charges as against the exorbitant charges collected by Banks.

Lack of central authority or peer to peer nature that is under the control of politicians is said to be another positive feature of the cryptocurrency systems

If economists therefore are envious of the popularity of Bitcoins and are afraid of its power to destabilize the monetary regulations, there is perhaps a need to look at some monetary reforms that take away the consumer advantages enjoyed by cryptocoins.

Perhaps the “Mintchips” concept of the Canadian Government  is an attempt in this direction which other monetary authorities may take a serious look at.

Naavi

Related Articles:

Experts clash over Crypto currency

Bitcoin attracts attention of mainstream investors and Regulators

Canadian Royal to test Mint chip payment systems

Posted in bitcoin, Cyber Law | Leave a comment

More Cryptocoins come up for attention

Close on the publicity generated by Bitcoin exchange rate going upto US$1132, many more crypto coins are coming to the attention of the public. First it was Litecoin and now Novacoin, Namecoin, Quark coin,Chinacoin,

Feathercoin also seem to be gaining attention.

If this trend continues we will see many more such crypto currencies coming up on the scene. Will all of them meet the required security and ethical standards? or will any of them spoil the image of current leaders like Bitcoin? needs to be watched out.

The speculation that is building up around Cryptocoins is exciting but causing concerns to monetary authorities and national security agencies.

Related Article-1

Related Article-2

Market Cap of different Crypto Coins

Naavi

Posted in bitcoin, Cyber Law | Leave a comment