HSBC Bank sends goons to silence a
Security Professional
Feb 2: An ethical hacker from Bangalore who
decided to disclose an E Banking vulnerability has found that the bank
instead of correcting the vulnerability would like to silence him.
Unlike another Bank which sent a legal notice for defamation, it is
reported that HSBC Bank sent its recovery goons to his house when he was
not available and caused annoyance and threat to his family members. RBI
should take note of this illegal behavior of the Bank and conduct a
suitable investigation.
Advertisements cause denial of access
Feb 2: We are all aware that ads provide for
monetization of content sites and are therefore a good thing to be there
in support of the free Internet system. But of late advertisers are
becoming greedy and want to usurp the content space. Just as some times
on TV we find that serials exist for the ads, Cricket matches are played
for the ads, the web content is also becoming secondary to ads. I am not
speaking of "Parked" websites which are deliberately created for
monetizing zero content. I refer to respected news paper sites which are
overwhelmed by the "Pop Up Ads" and "Video Ads". The Pop Up ads cover up
the entire page and prevents the visitor from viewing the content for
which he visited the site. Besides there is an increasing trend of video
ads that gulp bandwidth of the user. It is also becoming increasingly
common to disable closure of such ads just as pornographic ads used to
be. I saw one such ad today in the Business World site at the URL
http://businessworld.in/businessworld/businessworld/content/SC-Quashes-122-Telecoms-Licences-Issued-2008.html-1.
The ad itself belonged to Microsoft.. There are similar ads on other
sites and by other advertisers. I consider this as "Denial of Service"
and "Diminishing the value or utility of information
residing inside a computer resource" which are offences under ITA
2000/8. The advertiser as well as the publication will be responsible
for such an offence. I wish respectable publications ensure that ads
remain in the side bar and can pop out only on user's request. Similarly
video ads should by default be in pause mode and the user should have
the option to play it either in the allocated space or on full screen
mode. See the ad here
Director CERT Clarifies
Feb 1: Director of CERT-IN, Mr Gulshan Rai has
clarified in an interview with Mint that Government of India has so far
not exercised its discretion in any case of Website blocking but only
acted on Court orders.
Details
Indian Cyber Criminals are getting creative
January 31: Recently, an uneducated cyber
criminal in Bangalore showed how he could lock the Asterix of ATMs of
State Bank of Mysore and stop a customer's transaction midway to exploit
it later. This was technique as innovative as the "Lebanese loop"
and was highly ingenious as it just used the trick of sticking a broken
matchstick to keep the key depressed. This "Match Stick Magic" was
perhaps unique on a global scale.
Now yet another innovative technique seems to have
originated perhaps again from Bangalore which is challenging the
Nigerian Scams. This is a scam that has perhaps been inspired by a
famous Kannada TV serial by name "Mukta Mukta" and tries to lure
gullible investors into investing in films which have been stuck for
want of funds.
Copies of E mails received in the last two days are enclosed.
Recipients of the mail may end up losing a large
chunk of money in one go if they respond to such e-mails. I wish some
body checks the mobile numbers available and let me know their
experience.
Freedom of Expression on Internet..Gone..
January 30: The recent decision of Twitter to
censor its contents based on the political master's wishes in each
country is an indication that the commercial interests are always higher
than democratic interests for these companies. The move of the Indian
Government to arm twist the major intermediaries is therefore expected
to succeed in due course once the initial resistance wears off.
This article in asian age captures the status in India and
highlights the dangers. What is objectionable in the perception of the
Government officials is that content should be removed by the
intermediary when the objection is lodged by the affected party. This is
not acceptable. While the affected party can lodge a complaint with the
intermediary, removal has to follow a due process. The due process
should include a suitable documentary evidence which is placed by the
party, a process of examination through an ombudsman, a process of
arbitration where the request is disputed or a Court order as may be
required on a case to case basis.
Recently Naavi.org has received a letter from an
advocate stating that in 2005 there was an article published in the site
in which a person's name was mentioned in a litigation. Now that he is
acquitted, the advocate wanted the name to be removed from the old
article. Naavi.org has started a process of enquiry and to begin with
has asked the complainant notarized copies of the judicial order
relevant to the acquittal and an undertaking that no appeal is being
filed. On receipt, the author of the article would be asked to provide
his/her response and then a decision will be arrived at on how to deal
with the objection.
"Faith of Bank Customers Eroded"
Jan28: At a time when Banking frauds are ever
on the increase and we have reached a stage where E Banking has
destroyed the confidence of customers in the Indian Banking system, it
is a breath of relief when we here the words of RBI officials speaking
on the information security status stating "The implementation is not
effective, capacity management plans are not robust, appropriate vendor
exit strategies are not in place. The process of designing and
development of awareness programmes for customers is not in place".
These are words of the Executive Director of RBI Mr G Gopalakrishnan.
What is clear is that today RBI's guidelines are openly ignored and
Banks have turned "Rogue Banks". Hence whatever RBI proposes remains on
paper and fails during the implementation stage. The recent
recommendations of the Goplakrishna Working group is the last hope for
the revival of customer faith in Banks since it has recommendations
covering the implementation also. However the proof of the pudding is in
the eating. The failure of RBI is in not imposing appropriate penalties when
Banks fail to follow the RBI guidelines. As long as there is no strong
deterrence mechanism, the Banks will continue to act in defiance.
Report 1 :
Report 2
Report 3
Copy
of speech : Audio
Articles in naavi.org on GGWG
78 Adjudication Decisions ?
January 27: According to a
report in Deccan Chronicle, Bangalore, the Adjudicators of Karnataka
have so far provided 78 orders. This is for the first time that the news
has been released to the public and perhaps the orders were considered a
"State Secret" so far not to be seen by public. It is also notable that
out of these 78 decisions only the 77th decision is now on appeal with
the Cyber Appellate Tribunal and so far none of the orders were
contested.
Normally a situation such as these where 76 orders
were not appealed against indicates a very high quality of the orders.
The report has not revealed details of orders except the last two. It is
for experts to reflect if these two orders reflect the kind of quality
expected of 76 unappealed decisions. If not, it would be interesting to
see all these 76 orders to understand what they contained. This
would be an interesting case study of how effective is the system of
Adjudication in the hands of IT Secretaries of the State Governments.
When this system was introduced in 2003, Naavi.org
had pointed out that IT Secretaries who are responsible for the
development of IT in the State could face conflicts of interest when
dealing with the complaints against companies who work with the
Government on commercial deals. I have also queried from time to time
with Judicial Academies why they should not undertake IT training of
Judicial officers so that the Adjudicators can be appointed from out of
the Judicial community since lack of IT expertise in the judicial
community was the reason why DIT entrusted the responsibility with the
IT Secretaries in 2003 by way of a notification dated 25th March 2003.
Now that 78 cases are available in one single State
for a study, it would be worthwhile for some research student to conduct
a study of the Adjudication system and its effectiveness under IT
Secretaries and if a time has come for the Judicial Community to reclaim
this quasi judicial appointments either exclusively or as a two member
bench one of whom could continue to be the IT Secretary and the other
being a judicial member (A system already available at the CAT level).
Another aspect that needs to be considered is, if the
Jurisdiction of the IT Secretaries are so worked out that when there is
an apparent conflict of interest the complaint is handled by the IT
Secretary of a neighboring State
The historical decisions of the Adjudicator of
Karnataka quoted in the article of Deccan Chronicle are expected to be
the beginning of a thinking about review of the Adjudication system
under ITA 2000/8...
Article in DC
What to Expect in a Judicial Order
January 27: After the
sensational order
of the Adjudicator of Karnataka reported in these columns which
reflected the status in India on how Judicial orders are written at this
level, it was a revelation to read a judicial order in the Field
Vs Google case of copyright infringement. The case was first filed in
2004 and judgment delivered in 2006 in the Nevada District Court, USA.
Such judgments stand out because of the efforts taken by the Judge to
understand various aspects of law in depth and to make a reasoned
argument before arriving at the decision. In fact such judgments are
like text books which students of law love to read. It is not necessary
that only the High Court or the Supreme Court has to give such detailed
orders which they often do. Other authorities may also learn from such
orders on how they have to be documented.
Copy of
Judgement
Related Article
All Digital Certificates issued in India may
be invalid !!!
Jan 25: In an unusual development, an order
issued by the Adjudicator of Karnataka has created the effect that
all licenses issued for Certifying Authorities in India by the
Controller of Certifying Authorities will be rendered invalid. This
follows the effect of an order where the Adjudicator has interpreted
that the word "Person" used in Section 43 of ITA 2008 means only a
"Natural Person" and not applicable to a Company.
If this is true, then Controller of Certifying
Authorities would be wrong in issuing Certifying Authority license to
Corporate entities since according to section 2(g) Certifying Authority
means a "Person" who has been issued the license and therefore has to be
a natural person only.
The order is categorical that a "Company" can neither
seek remedy nor be accused under Section 43 of ITA 2008. With this no
Company can be accused of or seek relief under Section 66 for
unauthorized access also.
Hopefully this interpretation would be
corrected in an appeal at the earliest. Until then....we are in a
different dimension of Cyber Law in India.....a historical milestone in
deed ! .
Privacy Seminar in Mumbai to discuss Proposed
legislation
Jan 20: Privacy India in partnership with
Center for Internet Society and other organizations is organising a
conference on "Privacy matters" in Mumbai on 21st January 2011. The
conference will discuss the proposed Right to Privacy Bill which is
under consideration by the Government of India.
More information available
here : Update 21/01/12:
Copy of Naavi's Presentation :
Copy of new draft
of Privacy Bill :
A Report
Axis Bank Horror in Bangalore.. again
January 19: After the report of a Rs 39 lakh E
Banking fraud in Axis Bank recently, another major E Banking fraud has
been reported in Bangalore. As per the report of DNA, Bangalore, the
fraudster was able to obtain a debit card through a forged letter, get
event he address changed and withdraw Rs 15 lakhs from an unsuspecting
lady. The incident reveals that the procedures adopted by the Bank are
inadequate to meet the basic security requirements. The lady appears to
be running around Police for recovering the money where as she should
have perhaps claimed the money from the Bank which has acted on a forged
signature. ..DNA
Report
Innovative ATM Fraud in Bangalore
January 18: It is reported that a school
dropout found an innovative way of committing frauds on SBM ATM machines
in Bangalore. The modus operandi was to partially disable the ATM by
inserting a match stick to depress the * key. When the customer entered
a transaction, it failed after the access was authenticated. While the
customer was trying another ATM, the fraudster noted the PIN and after
he left, removed the match stick and continued the transaction.
Report in DNA
Websites to go on Strike against Ant Piracy
Legislation
Jan18: In a historic development, several
major websites are expected to observe one day shut down to pretest
against the anti piracy legislation proposed by US Congress. The
websites participating in the strike include Wikipedia, Reddit,
Cheezbuger, Boing Boing etc. It appears as if this is a fight between
the Internet and the Hollywood. The White House appears to support the
Silicon Valley in the controversy and being an election year in US, the
proposal is expected to be dropped for the time being. Seen in the
background of developments in India it appears that a serious
confrontation may start between the Digital Society and the Physical
society with Cyber Laws being at the center of the controversy. The
problem has always been that Cyber Laws are being drafted not by
Netizens but by Citizens. The laws therefore are biased in favour of Non
Netizens and hence frequent clash of societies is likely to continue.
Related Article
China and Pakistan offer less Internet
Censorship than India !
January 14: The article in firstpost.com
reveals how the Censorship attempt on the Internet in India compares
with China and Pakistan. Surprisingly the statistics reveal that the
number of occasions the Indian Government asked Google to take down
pages for political criticism was much more than in China or Pakistan.
...Detailed
Article
How Do you React to a Sec 79 Notice if you
are an intermediary?
January 13: Ever since the Government of India summoned the major social
networking companies namely Google, Face Book and Yahoo and
demanded that they install a pre-publication manual monitoring
system for content filtering, there has been considerable
discussions about what is right, what is feasible, what is legal
etc about the "Due Diligence" required to be exercised by
Intermediaries under Section 79 of the ITA 2008. Naavi therefore
suggests the following plan of action for Intermediaries to deal
with the situation....
More
Symantec Accused of using "Scareware"
Jan12: A resident of Washington has filed a
class suit against Symantec accusing that some of the security software
marketed by Symantec as Norton Utilities is actually a "Scareware".
Typically, a "Scareware" promises to identify and remove security
threats for free. When the consumer tries the software it presents
several computer errors as existing in the computer which cannot be
removed by the free version and suggests that the consumer buy the
registered version. According to the complainant the threats shown by
the software were non existent as revealed by a forensic investigation
and the software was designed to show errors even when non exist. It is
regrettable that even a reputed security company like Symantec should
use such anti consumer tactics. For records it may be said that Symantec
has denied the charge.
Related Article
Game Over
Jan 10: Yes it appears to be "Game Over" for
current generation of authentication systems used by Banks. A new
variant of the famous Zeus Virus has been reported by FBI which warns
"The malware is appropriately called “Gameover” because once it’s on
your computer, it can steal usernames and passwords and defeat common
methods of user authentication employed by financial institutions. And
once the crooks get into your bank account, it’s definitely “game over.”
Related Article
Safety in Banking is our Right
Jan 10: Bank customers in India have reached a
situation where they have to appeal to RBI to protect their right for
Safe banking. The recent threats to Internet Banking have made the
current system of Internet Banking completely unacceptable. We need a
totally new security for Internet Banking system that provides the
customer the comfort that his money cannot be stolen with the use of
trojans like SpyEye. The SpyEye threat is worrying because it is capable
of not only stealing the customer's money but also fool him with a fake
web page making him think that "All is Well". As a result the fraud goes
undetected for some time until the customer contacts the bank physically
or through means other than the Internet Banking.
Related Article1:
TOI :
PCWORLD
It is not as if technology cannot find a solution to
SpyEye problem. But effort and investment by Banks are needed in
this direction. I am aware that certain suggestions by security
professionals have been rejected by some banks because of profitability
considerations. It is however time for us to remind RBI that
"Profitability" cannot be the barometer for compromises on "Security".
An "Insecure Banking" is no "Banking". The current Banking licenses
should be deemed to be inoperative if security is compromised either
because of technology or otherwise.
Some Bankers are living in a fool's paradise that the
OTP system will guard them but they will realize that this is not
exactly a wise thought. I hope soon some enterprising hacker or a
security professional will demonstrate that event he OTP system is
vulnerable to malicious attacks.
ICICI Bank leads in Banking Frauds
Jan09: In an alarming revelation from an RTI
application, DNA has reported that ICICI Bank alone accounted for almost
half of the frauds reported to the RBI. Of the 5,319 cases reported in
the current financial year (till September) by 29 private banks, a
whopping 3,304 were from ICICI. Similarly, in 2010-11, ICICI reported
10,684 of the total 19,845 cases. The second highest numbers of cases
were reported by HSBC at 2,383 for the same period. CBI should
immediately start an investigation across the Bank to find out if there
is an involvement of Bank staff in these frauds. Simultaneously RBI also
has to initiate appropriate action to protect the Indian Bannking
system... More
Airtel resisting Port Out requests from
Customers
Jan08: Airtel appears to be using unfair
tactics to refuse Port-Out requests from customers. Normally port out
requests should be confirmed immediately. But Airtel customers have
reported multiple cases including some cases where Airtel has tried
refuse port out requests for unstated reasons. Perhaps TRAI needs to
look into this issue.
Mumbai is No 1 in Bank Frauds
Jan08: In an interesting information obtained
by DNA through an RTI application, it has been revealed that Mumbai has
been the city where the largest number of Bank fraud cases have been
reported in the last 5 years. According to the report the total loss in
Mumbai was Rs 1882 crores from 4099 reported cases. In New Delhi for the
same perid 1326 cases werhe reported with a loss of Rs 921 crores.
Chennai reported 1110 cases with a loss of Rs 484 cases and Kolkata
reported 1021 cases with a loss of Rs 548 crores. Bangalore reported
1006 cases with a loss of Rs 815 crores. Out of this during the
financial year 2010-11 alone, Mumbai and Delhi reported 787 and 335
cases with a loss of Rs 1049 crores and Rs 335 crores respectively. It
is not clear if Banks are makeing adequate provisions in their balance
sheets to cover such losses. According to Symantec, the loss was
estimated at a much higher level of around Rs 6500/- crores for the
entire country. RBI needs to take some special measures to protect the
Bank customers from this E-Banking loot.
Detailed
article
The never ending Cyber Chase
Jan08: An article in The Hindu of 8th January
2011 on Fraud risks in E Banking.
The article
What is the reaction of RBI for this?
Jan 08: At the instance of aggressive banks,
RBI is promoting Mobile Banking in India. Internet Banking itself
is yet to meet the basic security requirements of Banking and hence it
is difficult to understand the need for this new technology thrust. Here
is an example of an application
(Refer: http://spoofapp.com/) that is
meant to spoof Caller IDs and also change the voice. The sales pitch for
the application is "Protect your Privacy". However such tools are more
useful for breaching the privacy of others than protecting privacy. They
are extremely dangerous for the security of Mobile Banking. Until a
solution is found to ensure that such applications donot endanger Mobile
Banking transactions, RBI should refrain from introducing mobile Banking
in India. At the same time, since Internet Banking is also dependent on
mobiles for OTP, the risk of mobile spoofing places the entire Banking
system in India at risk. Naavi.org has drawn the attention of RBI
several times on this technology risk. At some point in future
Courts may have opportunities to question the role of RBI in securing E
Banking in India and the fact that the risks have been brought to the
attention of RBI will be a matter which may also determine the vicarious
liabilities of individual officers who have neglected these early
warnings. (P.S: According to one security professional this particular
application may be a malicious application. There are similar
applications which have been demonstrated by different professionals
even in public in the past. Non specialists should not try out such
applications for curiosity since they may create harm in the form of
excess billing or otherwise. Using such application is a crime. Naavi)
Amendments to Consumer Protection Act
Jan08: Amongst the amendments proposed to
Consumer Protection Act in the bill presented in the Parliament is a
provision for submission of applications in electronic form. As Naavi
has been advocating in the past, by virtue of Section 4 of ITA 2000 even
without the need for this amendment, it should be possible for the forum
to accept electronic applications. However, the amendment will remove
any doubts in this regard and it is therefore welcome. Many of the
tribunals and forums which have been given the freedom to device their
own procedures and are not bound by the procedures of the civil
procedure code have been following the procedure of asking the
complainant to submit affidavits in support of the contents of the
application. Since such affidavits need to be stamped, it impedes the
online submission process. Wherever online submissions are permitted, it
is necessary for the Court officers to clarify that a "Digitally Signed"
compliant is enough for the Court to take cognizance of the application
and they should stop the practice of insisting on the affidavits. Even
where an advocate is representing a litigant, the advocate can also be
permitted to send his submissions through a digitally signed document.
ITA 2008 provides both the Adjudicator and the Cyber Appellate tribunal
to not only receive submissions online but also conduct the entire
hearing online. Detailed rules of the online process are yet to be
developed. I request Cyber Appellate Tribunal to take necessary steps to
design the procedures for online submission of appeals and other
documents and start a new trend in Indian judiciary. This will also be a
guideline for those who may have to frame the rules under Consumer
Protection Act when the amendments are passed.
Internet Censorship in India
Jan07: Blocking of websites in India has been
in news for some time. The fact that this power is being politically
misused is confirmed by
the incident where the website of a political
cartoonist, Mr Aseem Trivedi participating in the Anna Hazare protest in
MMRDA grounds has been blocked.
TOI has reported that the cartoon site of Aseem Trivedi was blocked
by blocking the domain name cartoonsagainstcorruption.com.
The uniqueness of this blocking incident has been
that it is not an ISP level blocking but a blocking at the domain name
level by a notice to the domain name registrar BigRock. Also the site
has been removed not by a Court order but by Police action. While
the cartoon site has reportedly been now
moved to another host, the
incident creates a precedent of far reaching consequences though
in a wrong context.
It is to be noted that blocking an objectionable
content is different from forcing cancellation of a domain name. Domain
Name is a "Virtual Property" and what Mumbai Police have done in this
case is "Depriving a Citizen of his Right to Property". This is
violation of his fundamental right. The action needs to be reviewed.
The domain name registrar BigRock.in should also be
questioned on the propriety of their action without even giving an
opportunity for the domain owner to defend. It amounts to deficiency of
service on their part.
This incident is therefore to be considered as a
serious threat to democratic principles. I hope some action to question
the legality of the action of the Mumbai Police and BigRock would be
undertaken by some public spirited persons in Mumbai.
Related article in Sunday Guradian
150 HITECH Act audits to be conducted in 2012
Jan06: Office of Civil Rights has announced
that it is likely to conduct around 150 audits under HIPAA-HITECH Act
before Dec 2012.OCR will audit as wide a range of types and sizes of
covered entities as possible; covered individual and organizational
providers of health services, health plans of all sizes and functions,
and health care clearinghouses may all be considered for an audit.
Business Associates will be included in future audits.
Patient Data posted in Facebook for fun
Jan 05: An employee of a staffing agency in
California is reported to have posted some patient's information at
Providence Holy Cross Medial Center in Mission Hills. California. It is
said that the person defended his action by stating that "People, it's
just Facebook. Not reality. Hello? Again ... it's just a name out of
millions and millions of names. If some people can't appreciate my humor
then tough. And if you don't like it, too bad, because it's my wall and
I'll post what I want to." The case raises several issues of HIPAA
violation and Social Media policy and behaviour of persons on social
media, besides human ethics. Firstly, there is a privacy breach which is
a HIPAA violation. Was there a BA contract with the staffing company?
Were the employees adequately trained? are other HIPAA compliance issues
for both the hospital and the BA. Does the Face Book wall belong to the
user and he can do what he wants with it? is another question. Another
grey area is whether this remains a Civil wrong only or will it
constitute a "Criminal Offence"? since the person claims that he did not
have any malicious intention and the posting was only in jest. All in
all, an interesting legal case worth discussing in detail.
Related Article
New Transactions and Code Sets for HIPAA
Jan 05: From January 01, 2012, the new HIPAA
transaction code based on X12 Version 5010 and NCPDP Version D.0 have
become effective.
Related information
New Member Judicial appointed for CAT
January 04: After 6 months of waiting, Cyber
Appellate tribunal has become active once again with the appointment of
Justice S.K.Krishnan as "Member (Judicial)". He has assumed office
from 23rd December 2011. It is expected that Justice Mr Krishnan may be
designated as the "Chair Person" so that he can independently conduct
the sittings of the Tribunal.
Beware of mobile calls from +224...
January 04: It has been reported that there is a
mobile scam in operation in India which may cost the unwary consumers.
The modus operandi is that calls will be received from numbers such as
+22455200981, +22455104370. At first glance this appears to come from
Mumbai. If you donot pick up the call and attend to it as a missed call
and return the call, you may be charged Rs 50 per minute. If you pick up
the call at the first ring, you are likely to be told some thing such as
""we need your IMEI number and are authorized by DoT to collect it",
"free handset giveaway from micromax" etc." It appears that we should
refrain from returning any missed call unless we know the caller.
E Banking is Not "Safe Banking"
Jan 2: The recent revelations from the website
http://www.yashks.com/ of how ICICI
Bank's net banking facility is vulnerable has shaken the confidence of
the public on Indian Banking System. Additionally the increasing number
of ATM card cloning and Credit Card cloning have made it impossible for
customers of Banks to sleep peacefully if they hold an ATM Card or a
Credit Card or Internet Banking. Unfortunately, though RBI has provided
good guidelines to protect consumer interests, Banks are completely
ignoring such guidelines and challenging the customers to go for
litigation. Indian legal system being what it is, the advantage always
lies with the Banks which have deep pockets to stretch litigation until
the customer finds it impossible to continue.
Under these circumstances it is clear that E Banking
in India will never be as safe as it is envisaged under the Banking
license. It will be a game of chance for customers that if they are
lucky, they will not be hurt by the E-Banking frauds in their life time.
I therefore request RBI to delink E Banking services from the Banking
license and let Banks operate E Banking only as a E Business under an
NBFC license. Then public will know that they cannot expect the same
level of security as they expect in traditional Banking. However in such
cases Banks should not call it as a "Banking service" and no privileges
that are normally available to a "Bank" should be made available to
those Banks. This E Business of "E Money Transactions" should be thrown
open to the non banking institutions who may be able to provide better
security than the Banks who misuse the trust they enjoy from being a
traditional banker to provide deficient E-Banking services.
A public debate on this "Banking Reform" is perhaps
the need of the hour.
New Year
Begins with a warning
Jan1: Home based activities that generate income
is of interest to many and on the eve of a New Year is more palatable
than at other times as an opening for a "New Beginning". However, the
Internet has become so untrustworthy these days that any such news has
to be taken with a bucket full of salt...Here
is an example of one such news which all readers must take note.
Death of QR Code!
Dec 31: In recent days QR Code had emerged as
a convenient tool on mobile devices for transfer of information from a
printed code picture to data on the mobile. Unfortunately the QR code
seems to be heading for a premature death since hackers have found it as
an easy tool to spread malware. It may no longer be wise to use the QR
Code scanner on the phone to scan any Code. Naavi.org will also remove
the QR Code in its contact form to avoid any problems arising in future.
Related Article
HIPAA Audit is a Business Threat!
Dec 26: The results of a recent survey in USA
about patient data breach has come out with interesting results.
Firstly, 96% of the respondents reported some data breach within the
last two years which is an alarming situation. 41% resulted from
employee negligence. About 43% of the breaches were identified during an
audit making it a dreaded business risk for most organizations.
More details
One More ITA 2008 Case against Face Book
Dec 25: An FIR has been registered against
Face Book under Section 66A of ITA 2008 for defaming Hindu Gods and
asking for burning of Bhagvadgita in Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Report
Cyber Law to enter BBM Curriculum
Dec 25: The forum of business Management Teachers
in a workshop at Mangalore decided to make Cyber Law a part of the
curriculum for BBM. The addition of Cyber Laws into Management
curriculum was long overdue since any business presently is inseparable
from E Business.
Details
Blocking of Websites by Reliance
Dec 24: It has been reported that Reliance has
blocked a host of websites providing file hosting services on the
pretext of possible copyright infringement of Don 2 movie released this
week. Though a Court order is cited, it is unclear whether the
implementation is as per the order and whether there was a reasonable
ground for such blocking. It is unfortunate that ISPs are irresponsibly
resorting to website blocking. It is necessary for them to realize that
if their action is found to be not backed by an appropriate Court order,
they will be liable for punishment for wrongful interception.
Related Report
Social Networking Sites.. questioned by Delhi
High Court
Dec24: 21 executives of different Social
Networking sites were summoned by Delhi High Court in connection with a
complaint filed by a journalist Mr Vinay Rai. Mr Rai is the editor of a
Urdu daily Akbari. It is alleged that the You Tube, Face Book and Google
amongst others have hosted content which is objectionable from obscenity
and religious view point and accordingly they have been asked to remove
the content before February 6, 2012.
Report
Where is Internet Banking safety in India heading?
Recently, a security specialist in Bangalore released
a video in which he demonstrated how the Internet Banking System of
ICICI Bank was vulnerable to a virus attack....The revelation of the
security vulnerability in the system of ICICI Bank is also to be
considered as a notice to not only to ICICI Bank but also all other
Banks which may have similar problems....More
Naavi gets the ID "Naavi" on Face Book
Dec 22: Over the last few months, I was
corresponding with Face Book for release of the short ID "Naavi" which
had been registered by some other user. Once the name was released but
before it could be re-booked by me, it was booked once again by another
person. Finally the name has been released by the second person and
after a waiting period it became available again to me and it has been
registered. Now
http://www.facebook.com/naavi points to my Face Book account. This was
made possible because the current user agreed with my request and
voluntarily changed his ID from "naavi".
However the fact remains that "Naavi" was a
registered trademark and as per the terms and conditions of Face Book,
it was the responsibility of Face Book management to ensure that the ID
was withdrawn from the earlier person who had registered and handed over
to me when I demanded. Face Book failed in discharging this
responsibility.
In the recent controversy between Face Book and Mr
Kapil Sibal, Face Book had publicly stated that if any user is violating
the terms of agreement, they would take action to correct it. However it
may be taken on record that in this case involving the claim on the
short ID of "naavi", Face Book failed to keep up to their words.
Their commitment given to Mr Kapil Sibal therefore is not truthful.
ICICI Bank Picks a fight with a Security
Consultant
Dec 21: ICICI Bank is touchy when some body
questions the security in its E Banking systems. Recently a Security
professional Mr K.S.Yash, from Bangalore had
highlighted a vulnerability that existed in the ICICI Bank Internet
Banking system by posting a video of a demo. The demo showed how a
user of ICICI Bank system may place a fund transfer order for a certain
amount through the Bank's Internet Banking website and end up executing
a fund transfer of a different amount to a different beneficiary. The
demo involved a video of a live session and clearly demonstrated the
existence of the vulnerability. Instead of taking steps to rectify the
security loophole, ICICI Bank appears to have sent a notice to the
security consultant threatening legal action.
ICICI Bank claims that the video contains false
information meaning that the vulnerability does not exist. However, the
undersigned has also seen the demo live and the fact that the
vulnerability exists cannot be untrue. What should be done by the Bank
is important. Bank should thank the consultant for having brought the
security weakness to the notice of the Bank before real hackers get into
the Act using the same or different methodology. The consultant has not
given any source code for the exploitation of the vulnerability and
therefore it is difficult to understand why the Bank should object to
what is essentially a security alert.
It would be interesting if ICICI Bank challenges a
public debate on the security vulnerability shown by the consultant
rather than throwing up threats of legal action.
Mobile Dealers Targetted by Hackers.. Are the MSP
s at fault?
Dec 20: In a TV program on mobile hacking in
Suvarna News yesterday, it was revealed that a mobile dealer in
Channapatna (a town about 60 kms from Bangalore) had suffered a loss of
Rs 15000/- through mobile hacking. The dealer had several demo mobiles
given by service providers which had a specific application to store
re-charge stock. He received a call stating that he will be getting a
bonus recharge from the service provider and it will reflect in his
account after he keeps his mobile switched off for about 5 minutes.
When the dealer switched on the mobile again, he saw that instead of
additional amount in his account, the available amount had also bee
drawn out in the form of recharges to different mobiles at different
places. According to the dealer 12-15 such cases have been reported in
Channapatna itself over the last 6 months indicating the extent of such
frauds across the country. The beneficiaries of this fraud are
indirectly the mobile companies themselves since whether the amount was
used by a fraudster or any body else, they have got their value. This
also gives room to speculate that the mobile companies may be hand in
glove with the fraudsters in such frauds to improve their turnover. Link
to Suvarna News Program broadcast (in Kannada) on 19th December 2011 :
Part 1 Part 2.
Part3
How Much have Indian Banks lost due to Phishing?
Dec 20: It is always a tough task to get
information about losses on account of Frauds in Banks. By tradition,
Banks are permitted to hide the actual details of the losses on account
of "Bad Debts" by making a "Provision" and reporting "Debts less
provisions" in the balance sheet. However no such protection exists in
respect of "Losses on account of Crimes in Banks". However, Indian Banks
have no proper system of reporting such losses in their Balance sheets.
According to RSA, the estimate of Phishing losses in India in 2011 is to
the extent of US Dollars 27.8 million (approximately Rs 140 crores). (See
report) However earlier estimates by other agencies are of the order
of at least Rs 1200 crores. Hence there appears to be a gross under
estimation of the losses.
In a recent speech to the Chartered
Accountants, Dr Subbarao, Governor of RBI also pointed out that the
reported financial statements of Banks were not truthful. (Copy
of speech). It is high time the Chartered Accountants Association of
India reviews the current Bank audit system and ensures that "Estimated
Losses on Frauds" are not suppressed under "Provisions".
More detais of the report from RSA is available here. :
Copy of RSA Online Fraud Report
Ten Commandments of Banking
Dec 20: Dr K.C.Chakravarthy, Deputy Governor,
RBI, has reminded Bankers that "Thou shalt manage the people with
empathy". In a commendable sppech delivered at the Manipal Academy,
Bangalore, he has reminded Bankers that an "essential
characteristic of Banks is that they are highly leveraged and, hence,
special and need to be regulated for protecting the interest of
depositors." Of late Bankers have become so commercialized in their
approach that they are even ignoring the regulatory role of RBI. The
"Ten Commandments" that Dr Chakravarthy has lead out should be an
eye-opener to the current day Bankers who are more IT operators than
bankers. The complete speech is worth putting into text books on Banking
and is
available here.
Courts to use Website to communicate orders
Dec 19: In a confidential report submitted by
NIC to Mumbai High Court, it has been suggested that the High Court may
use digitally signed e-mails for communicating its orders to the lower
court. However it has been stated that since this may take some time,
High Court may in the meantime upload their orders to its website
to be picked up by the other Courts....
Report in HT
2012 security threat predictions for Mobiles
Dec19: "Mobile pick pocketing" is on the
increase and is estimated to have cost Rs 5 crores in 2011 from Android
users. In 2012, there could be an increase in bluetooth viruses,
application based malwares, spread of viruses through text and MMS
messages which could try to steal money from your account. It could make
free calls billed to your number, steal data, send out spam messages,
premium SMS messages, download paid games etc. Since "mobile" is an
always on device it has the potential to be used as a botnet component.
These threats along with the threat of SIM card cloning has to be
considered by users of Mobiles and in particular users of smart phones.
In particular users should be circumspect of applications and games
downloaded from un-trusted sources. Like in the computers, it is too
risky to own a smart phone without a good anti virus application from a
reliable source.
Related Story
Banks seek dilution of Damodaran Committee Report
Dec 19: M.Damodaran Committee on Customer
Services gave its recommendations on Customer Service in Banks on 3rd
August 2011. The report contained several important customer
oriented suggestions. However RBI is yet to finalize its view on the
report. It is however learnt that some Banks are lobbying with RBI for a
massive dilution of the recommendations so that Banks can escape
liability arising out of their negligence. In the interest of the
customers, we hope RBI will resist this industry pressure.
Related Report1
Related Report2 :
Related Report3
Cyber Crimes on the rise..but
Dec 19: An article in livemint on current
status of Cyber Crime statistics in India.
Article
US Legalizes Cyber War
Dec 18: US has taken an important step to pass
a law to legalize Cyber war operations by which an offensive attack from
US on Cyber Space of other sovereign countries may now be legit in US.
The new law stipulates that U.S. military is now authorized to
make war via the Internet and all the rules that apply to conventional
war, also apply to Cyber War. This development also underscores the need
for more indigenization of Software and Hardware IT supplies to India
since we cannot trust either China or US both of whom may supply
software/hardware which is deliberately embedded with backdoors...Related
Article : A
draft
Internet Censorship through backdoor?
Dec 18: According to Privacy legislation
observers in India, the amendments to Copyright Act presently pending
before the Parliament could be used as an instrument of backdoor
censorship. The concept of "Self Regulation" that the Government
proposes is considered as a facade to cover the imposition of
Government's intentions to regulate the content of the Internet to
protect the Government against public criticism.:
Related Article
DIT Guidelines on Social Media
Dec 17: In continuation of the earlier post on
this subject, a perusal of the draft guidelines issued by
the Government on the use of Social media by Government departments
indicate the following two paragraphs.
"Since profiles on social network are linked more
often to individuals and not organizations, for organization's
site/page, a separate work profile may be created which can then be
linked to a general e-mail address that is accessible to anyone in the
team, enabling them to administer the social networks without
compromising on individual privacy."
"Each new account requires a URL, user name and/or email address and a
password. A proper record of log in ids and password must be maintained.
This is critical as multiple people may be authorised to post on behalf
of the department".
I think the report in ET is an interpretation of the above two
paragraphs.
This apart, the idea of Government departments using Face Book etc in the
manner suggested is not a desirable proposition and the issue of the
draft guideline will be regretted at some point of time in the future. ..Copy
of the draft guideline
Password Sharing to be legalized by Indian
Government?
Dec16: A report in Economic Times today
suggests that the Government of India is thinking of a code by which
Government employees would use Facebook. One interesting aspect of this
code is reported to be that "the password of the account would be known
to others in the department". It is difficult to understand what the
Government is upto. If "passwords" are officially meant to be "shared",
the sanctity of the access system based on passwords would be officially
destroyed.
Report in ET
Bring Your Own Devices Opens up Security Concerns
Dec 16: A survey conducted by ISACA on the
concept of Bring Your Own Devices (BYOD) has highlighted the the new
threat perceptions arising out of the employee ownership of the devices.
There is no doubt that certain sections of the industry favour the idea
of employee's bringing their own access devices to their place of work.
This may be both economical and convenient. However security is built
neither on convenience nor economy though they do affect the final
outcome of security implementation. If the concept is to be given any
consideration the data security and access authentication systems as
well as the real time security monitoring systems need to undergo a
substantial modification. Rushing the concept of BYOD at the current
stage is likely to result in a huge legal risk for all organizations.
Related Article
Seven Most Significant Hacks of 2011
Dec 16: Here is a compilation of seven most
significant hacking events worldwide compiled by a security observer.
Report
First Adjudication Application filed in Kolkata
Dec 15: First adjudication application under
ITA 2008 has been filed in West Bengal. The application has been filed
by Mr R Gopi in respect of a loss of Rs 339,000/- suffered by a customer
of State Bank of India through unauthorized access to his Internet
Banking account. This was a typical case where the RBI's OTP system had
failed since the fraudster had simultaneously disabled the original SIM
card of the customer, got a duplicate SIM card with false documents and
used it for completing the fraud. The Mobile service provider involved
was Vodafone. The adjudication application notes SBI and Vodafone as
respondents along with the executives of both SBI and Vodafone.
IP address Details from Gmail
Dec 10: Often an account holder of a gmail
requires to know the IP address from which his account is accessed. This
requirement is more and is of critical need when gmail services are
being used for business and multiple access accounts are created.
Presently gmail provides information about last 10 transactions as a
security routine. However if information is required beyond the last 10
transactions, the position is unclear. There is a wrong interpretation
that such requirement can be met with only a Court order. But this is
legally untenable. It is the right of every data owner to request for
and be provided information about himself from the data processor
without need for court intervention. Court order is required only of a
person wants information about some body else. This is of course a matter
which should be part of the terms and conditions and privacy policy and
Google may be interested in restricting the rights to some extent. But
it is high time Google clarifies and introduces appropriate measures to
disclose the account holder's information when required.
High Profile Cyber Crime Cases-2011
Dec8: Here is an interesting article on some
of the successful Cyber Crime investigations that occured during 2011.
..The
Most Notorious Cyber Crooks of 2011 – And How They Got Caught
Aaadhar Project may be discontinued?
Dec 8: It is reported that the Parliamentary
committee has rejected the UID Bill and consequently the aadhar project
in its present form may have to be kept in abeyance until a new Bill is
drafted and passed. ..Related
Report
Now I understand why CAT Chairman has not been
appointed
Dec 08: The post of the chairman of Cyber
Appellate Tribunal is remaining vacant for last six months. Despite
repeated reminders at several levels no action has been taken by DIT.
Now that we know that the ministry has to scan the Internet for
"political criticism" and identify content indulging in criticism of
Government or the Congress leaders, they donot have time for anything
else. It is to be noted that during the first half of 2011, only one
content has been found objectionable on Google on grounds of "National
Security" while 255 items have been found objectionable for political
expediency.
Related Article
Government Criticism muzzled
Dec08: According to this report in Hindu,
during the first half of 2011, Indian Government sought to remove 255
items classified as "Government Criticism" from Google content.
Additionally 39 items were sought to be removed on grounds of
defamation, 20 due to privacy and security concerns, 14 due to
impersonation, three pornographic items and one due to national security
reasons. This shows that the Government machinery in DIT is is working
only to serve the political masters and not to serve people.
Related Article
The report also says that Google refused to remove
the content related to Government criticism and the news now is that the
Income Tax department is making some demands on Google. It is not clear
if the two are related. But knowing how this UPA Government is
targetting Anna Hazare group, a link between the two incidents cannot be
ruled out.
Related Article
CNet Download.com bundles adware
Dec08: Security observers always say that
"Nothing comes free on Internet" and warn users of "Free Downloads"
with attached trojans. Normally people expect that reputed download
sites donot resort to such unethical practices of bundling
adware/spyware/malware with genuine free installations. It has now been
exposed that CNet which runs download.com instals several adware
programs with its free installations.
Report :
Apology from CNET
Mr Kapil Sibal should think of taking action on such
misuse of public trust by intermediaries rather than think of using
Internet censorship to curb Anna Hazare or to muzzle political
opposition.
Social Media Censorship in India
Dec 6: In a surprising announcement,
Union Minister of IT who has not found time for last 6 months to appoint
a chairperson for CAT found time to criticize social media and ask them
to set up a human pre publication scrutiny of content. The suggestion is
highly impractical besides being undesirable and unnecessary. There is
already a law to deal with objectionable content and the current attempt
is either to be treated as an attempt to bring a new censorship law or
to act ultra vires the law. It is speculated that the announcement was
triggered by some criticism of the Congress leaders on the Face Book or
more probably a preparation for the prevention of the use of Social
Media for the next stage of Anna Hazare Campaign. As usual this
could be another mistake which the Congress may regret.
Related Article :
Assocham Opposes proposal
How weak Internet Banking systems pose a threat to
customers
Dec 3: Internet Banking has been a nightmare
for innocent customers who constantly live in the fear of Phishing
frauds. Though RBI has brought several regulations in favour of the
customers, intransigent bankers continue to place customers at risk.
Though law is in favour of customers being compensated by Banks in such
cases and Naavi himself is in the forefront of some of these
fights, the delay and cost in pursuing litigation continues to be a
cause of worry. With GOI being completely oblivious to the need of
appointing the presiding officer to CAT in place of the previous
incumbent who retired, vicitms have been made to wait endlessly while
the Banks are enjoying the funds of the customers.
In such a scnario here is a video of how a "Man
in the Middle Attack " can divert banking transactions to fraudsters. It
is high time Bankers and RBI take note of these technical risks and
ensure that adequate security is provided to customers.
See the Youtube Video here
EHR Incentive deadline under HIPAA-HITECH
Act extended
Dec2: In an effort to make it easier for
Health Care Providers to qualify for maximum payments under HITECH Act,
the deadline for Stage 2 compliance has been extended from 2013 to 2014
for those who attest by February 2012 that they qualified for Stage 1 by
adopting EHRs this year. The change in the deadline is meant to remove
the disincentive for providers to adopt and use health IT right away.
Related Article
USA conducting survey for ascertaining
China Cyber Risk
Dec 1: US Government conducted a survey of
telecom companies and software companies to identify presence of foreign
hardware and software and to ensure that there are no malicious
installations to spy on US assets. In the survey , the U.S. Commerce
Department asked for a detailed accounting of foreign-made hardware and
software on the companies' networks. It also asked about
security-related incidents such as the discovery of "unauthorized
electronic hardware" or suspicious equipment that can duplicate or
redirect data The survey required companies to provide a detailed
outline of who made equipment including optical-transmission components,
transceivers and base-station controllers. Companies that refused to
respond could face criminal penalties under the Defense Production Act,
a 1950 law allowing the government to manage the wartime economy,
according to the survey. It is time India also does a similar survey...
Related Article