Author Archives: Vijayashankar Na

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) In the previous articles, we have discussed the different provisions of the regulations for AI adoption and usage in Judiciary released … Continue reading →

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) Continuing our discussions on the AI regulations in Judiciary proposed by the Supreme Court let us explore section 49,50 an 51 … Continue reading →

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) In prescribing the AI usage regulations for the judiciary, the authors of the regulation encountered the need to recognize the overlapping … Continue reading →

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) The draft guidelines has prescribed an elaborate system for oversight, adudits and incident management under Chapter V, which we shall discuss … Continue reading →

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) In continuation of our discussions on the proposed regulations for use of AI in judiciary released by Supreme Court for public … Continue reading →

(P.S: This is in continuation of our discussion on the suggested AI regulations for Judiciary by the supreme Court) The proposed AI regulation in Judiciary has envisaged a strong Governance mechanism for AI usage. Firstly a full time permanent apex … Continue reading →