Suggestion I: 
  Spam Control:
   “Spamming” is related to 
  “Marketing”, “Freedom of Speech” and “Privacy Rights”. It is necessary to 
  therefore bring legislation on controlling “Spam” without affecting the 
  genuine right to use the Internet media for marketing both for commercial, 
  social and political purpose. Similarly, the legislation should not curb the 
  freedom of speech while upholding privacy of individuals. 
  The suggestion on “Spam 
  Control” therefore includes modalities for managing genuine use of Internet as 
  a communication medium through a “Bulk E-Mail Licensing Programme”.
   It is open for the Government 
  to designate the CCA (Controller of Certifying Authorities” as the appropriate 
  authority for the purpose of Spam Control. 
   XY) Sending Unsolicited 
  Electronic Messages: 
   Except under 
  a valid Bulk E-mail license from an appropriate authority 
   Whoever,
    1) Sends or 
  causes to send an unsolicited electronic message/s of any description 
  with a source identity that is not disclosed, or
   2) sends or 
  causes to send an unsolicited electronic message/s of any description after 
  the addressee has duly notified him of his intention not to receive such 
  communication as prescribed under this Act, or 
  3) Except 
  under an express consent of the recipient, sends or causes to send an 
  electronic message/s of any description containing information that is 
  obscene or offensive, that may defraud or is intended to defraud, that may 
  cause or is intended to cause distress, that may break or is intended to break 
  any law in force or that may otherwise create disharmony in or harm to the 
  society or cause harm to the integrity of the nation and friendly relations 
  with other countries, 
   shall be 
  punishable under this Act with any or all of the following
  
    
    a) Payment of compensation or damage to each of the person/s affected by 
    the offence subject to a maximum of Rs 1 lakh per person.
    
  
    b)
Imprisonment subject to a maximum of Two Years
    
  
    c)
Fine subject to a maximum of Rs 2 lakhs
    
  
    
    
  
    Notwithstanding the punishment or penalties mentioned above, if the offence as 
  defined under (XY) above results in or is intended to result in an act that is 
  an offence under any other law in force, the offender shall also be liable 
  for punishment or penalty to which the offender is liable under such laws.
    
  
    Provided 
  however that if any message is caused to be transmitted by mistake of fact or 
  due to technological factors beyond the reasonable control of the person in 
  whose name the message is sent, no offence would be recognized if such a 
  person proves that the message was sent without his knowledge and he had 
  exercised all due diligence to prevent commission of the offence.
    
  
 
    
  Explanation:
  
  For the 
  purpose of the section (XY) above,
  
  a.       the 
  disclosure of source identity is considered sufficient if a reply can be sent 
  to the disclosed source address and such reply does not bounce.
  
  b.      an 
  addressee may communicate his intention “not to receive” a communication 
  through a digitally signed message or in any other manner that may be laid 
  down for the purpose and unless specified, such notice shall expire after 3 
  months.
  
  c.       the 
  unsolicited message shall be admissible as evidence in a Court of law even if 
  it is not digitally signed. (Ed: corresponding change required to be made 
  in Indian Evidence Act)
  
  d.      the 
  intermediary who causes the unsolicited messages to be transmitted shall also 
  be liable under the Act as if the offence was committed by them unless he 
  proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge and the 
  intermediary had exercised all due diligence to prevent commission of the 
  offence.
  
  e.       a message 
  is considered “solicited” if it may be inferred from the conduct and existing 
  business or other relationship of the recipient that he consented to such 
  messages being sent to him.
  
  f.        “Express 
  Consent” in sub clause (3) means only a consent obtained through a manually 
  entered affirmative expression.
  
  g.       
  “Appropriate Authority” for the purpose of this section shall be the 
  “Controller of Certifying Authorities” or any other authority specifically 
  designated for the purpose by an order of the Government of India.
   
  
  (Comments 
  welcome)
  Naavi
  July 5, 2005
  
   
 
  Related Article/Information:
 
    
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 For Structured Online 
 Courses in Cyber laws, Visit Cyber Law College.com