Let's Build a Responsible Cyber Society


Spreading Disharmony through Corporate e-mail network
.

 

(The information mentioned here in is based on submissions made to Naavi.org by the recipients of the e-mails mentioned herein.. Ed)

In an interesting case which opens a debate on many points of legal propriety, Oracle has been facing the wrath of one section of community in Bangalore for not disciplining one of their employees who is accused of having discredited Bangaloreans and Bangalore Police and incited violence, hatred and community disharmony.

The origin of the conflict is the following mail:

From: Ayon Mitra [mailto: Ayon.Mitra@oracle.com]
    Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 1:14 PM
    To: sharinginfo_blr_in@oracle.com
    Subject: RE: Am i safe in Bangalore?

 Bangalore police is useless. They are helpless. We laugh at them. You should    take pity on them. They need money. Bangalore people are poor. We from rest     of India has made Bangalore see the money. So they are here to begg money    from us. If you are from East India, like Bihar, UP, Jharkhand etc. u know    how people are there. Try to keep urself armed while traveling in night. If     somebody comes before you just bang him/them. If u r in gang just do the    hell for them. Don't go to police. Police here is a useless showpiece. Thats    why Bangalore has become the worst place to live in.

 

One of the recipients of this mail distributed the mail to the public and the online press. Obviously, it drew angry responses from many who even brought it to the attention of Oracle whose network had been used for the distribution of the above message and also since the person concerned was a staff member of Oracle.

A few days later Mr Mitra posted the following message to one of the respondents:

From: Ayon Mitra [mailto:Ayon.Mitra@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Rehman, Ajas
Subject: RE: Am i safe in Bangalore?

Hi Ajas

I agree to you. That was an un-intentional mistake by me. I apologized for that to all Bangaloreans. I have no complain against Bangalore crime rate and neither Bangaloreans. The flow of money in Bangalore is highest in India. So the crime rate will increase as money attracts crime. Its one of the safest place in India. I don't want to discriminate between community and religion. I am living with a Muslim boy. And I will tell you I really am very happy to have him as my flat mate. My parents are here also with me. And we really live happily. Police in Bangalore are much much better than what we have in our places. I very much agree to this. Anyway, it really hurted all Bangaloreans who are really very nice and innocent people. I am wrong in my part. I strongly  apologize for that. Please convey my message to all your Bangalorean firnds.

 Regards 

Ayon

 After Several protests landed in Oracles lap, Mr Lopamudra Bhattacharya of Oracle sent in this response on behalf of Oracle PR to one of the persons who indicated that legal action may be contemplated on Mr Mitra.

Quote:

Oracle takes the laws of each country in which it operates, the rights of the individuals it employs and its own guiding principles very seriously.   In relation to how we discipline our employees for any misdemeanours, this is a matter between Oracle management (including the individual's manager) and the individual concerned.  We do not intend to discuss such actions with people from outside the company, regardless of the issue.

In this current case, we have taken disciplinary actions both against the individual who caused the problem and against those of our employees who lacked discretion and who broke our internal communication rules by sending internal correspondence outside the company.  We ask that you respect our right to do this even if you do not see the immediate effects of our actions to either discipline past unacceptable actions or prevent such future similar poor behaviours.

As stated above, we also take very seriously the laws of each country in which we operate.   To this end, we do not appreciate your threats either against our employee or Oracle Corporation itself and intend to pass on your emails to the Cyber Crime Police as we do not believe that the laws of India permit such actions either against fellow-citizens or corporations.
 

Regards,
Lopa
 

Unquote

The above mails throw up several academic questions which I would like the informed visitors of Naavi.org may comment upon.

1. Were the contents of Mr Mr Ayon Mitra's e-mail of 21st May 2005 "Defamatory" on Bangaloreans as a Community, and Bangalore Police as an organ of the State?

2. Were the contents of the said e-mail constituted "Inciting Hatred and Violence" and "Spreading of Disharmony in the Community"? and be covered by the sections 153 A, 153 B, 499 and 505 of IPC? (See Below for extracts)

3. What is the liability of Oracle the organization through whose network the offence was committed?

4. Is the matter an "Internal Matter of Oracle"? or " Is there a public interest in the same?"

5. How far Oracle was right in refusing to disclose the action taken against the employee?

6. How far Oracle was right in taking action against those employees who were held responsible for "sending the internal communication outside the network"?. Does it amount to "Protecting an IPC accused?","Undue harassment to a law abiding person", "Suppression of Information which the Company is bound to disclose"?

7. Was there a "Duty to the Nation" or "Freedom of Expression" and "Freedom of Information" in the act of the information being sent out of the network.

8. Where do we draw a line in matters of crimes coming under IPC or other Statutes as "Internal Matters" and "Public Interest"?

9. To what extent the "E-mail apology made to one of the respondents" could be considered as "Atonement"?

10. Any other issue which is relevant to corporate e-Governance, Due Diligence and Public Relations Management.

Naavi

June 15, 2005

Reference Sections of IPC:

153A. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony

    (1) Whoever-

        (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or

        (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquillity, [or]

        [(c) organises any exercise, movement, drill or other similar activity intending that the participants in such activity shall use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, or participates in such activity intending to use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, against any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community and such activity for any reason whatsoever causes or is likely to cause fear or alarm or a feeling of insecurity amongst members of such religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community,]

shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Offence committed in place of worship, etc-  (2) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (1) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.]

153B. Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national-integration

    (1) Whoever, by words either spoken or written or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise,-

        (a) makes or publishes any imputation that any class of persons cannot, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established or uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, or

        (b) asserts, counsels, advises, propagates or publishes that any class of persons shall, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, be denied or deprived of their rights as citizens of India, or

        (c) makes or publishes any assertion, counsel, plea or appeal concerning the obligation of any class of persons, by reason of their being members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, and such assertion, counsel, plea or appeal causes or is likely to cause disharmony or feelings of enmity or hatred or ill-will between such members and other persons,

shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

    (2) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (1), in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall be liable to fine.]

499. Defamation

Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.

Explanation 1- It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.

Explanation 2- It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.

Explanation 3- An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.

Explanation 4- No imputation is said to harm a person's reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loath some state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful......

505. Statements conducting to public mischief.

(1) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report,-

    (a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or

    (b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquility; or

    (c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community;

shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

(2) Statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill-will between classes Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement or report containing rumour or alarming news with intent to create or promote, or which is likely to create or promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

    (1) Offence under sub-section (2) committed in place of worship, etc- Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (2) in any place of worship or in an assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.

    Exception- It does not amount to an offence, within the meaning. of this section when the person making, publishing or circulating any such statement, rumour or report, has reasonable grounds for believing that such statement, rumour or report is true and makes, publishes or circulates it in good faith and without any such intent as aforesaid.

Comments are welcome



For Structured Online Courses in Cyber laws, Visit Cyber Law College.com

 

Back To Naavi.org